Security Review Report - Convert to Markdown API
Generated: 2025-01-25 15:45 UTC
Status: Complete
Verified:
Executive Summary
This document presents a comprehensive security review of the Convert to Markdown API codebase. The review identified several security concerns ranging from minor information disclosure to potential credential exposure. While the application follows many security best practices, there are areas that require immediate attention to enhance the overall security posture.
Review Scope
The security review covered the following components:
- Email Service Configuration (
email-gmail-api.js
) - Environment Configuration (
.env
files) - Test Scripts (
test-email-config.js
,test-signup-local.js
) - Authentication Middleware (
middleware/auth.js
) - Input Validation (
middleware/fileUpload.js
) - API Endpoints (
index.js
)
Key Findings
1. Hard-coded Service Account Client ID
Severity: Medium
Location: functions/lib/email-gmail-api.js:102
The Gmail service account client ID is hard-coded in the error handling section:
console.error('Client ID should be: 116940581280353324169');
Risk: This exposes internal configuration details that could aid attackers in understanding the system architecture.
2. Email Address Exposure
Severity: Low
Location: Multiple files
The sender email address lindsay@knowcode.tech
is hard-coded in several places:
email-gmail-api.js:49
.env
files
Risk: While not critical, this creates maintenance issues and potential information disclosure.
3. Service Account Key Path Reference
Severity: Medium
Location: .env
files, email configuration
The service account key path is referenced in environment variables:
GOOGLE_APPLICATION_CREDENTIALS=../deploy-gcp/keys/gmail-service-account.json
Risk: Path traversal and predictable file locations could be exploited if other vulnerabilities exist.
4. Test Files with Production-like Code
Severity: Low
Location: test-email-config.js
, test-signup-local.js
Test files contain production-like code without proper isolation or mock implementations.
Risk: Accidental execution in production or exposure of test infrastructure.
5. Authentication Implementation
Severity: Well Implemented
Location: middleware/auth.js
Positive findings:
- Proper API key validation
- Rate limiting based on user plan
- Firestore integration for key management
- Good error handling with appropriate HTTP status codes
6. Input Validation
Severity: Well Implemented
Location: middleware/fileUpload.js
Positive findings:
- File size limits enforced (10MB)
- Proper MIME type handling
- Stream-based processing to prevent memory exhaustion
- Field name validation
7. Missing Security Headers
Severity: Medium
Location: API responses
The application does not set common security headers such as:
X-Content-Type-Options
X-Frame-Options
X-XSS-Protection
Strict-Transport-Security
Content-Security-Policy
8. Verbose Error Messages
Severity: Low
Location: Throughout the application
Error messages sometimes reveal internal implementation details that could aid attackers.
Remediation Plan
Immediate Actions (High Priority)
Remove Hard-coded Client ID
- Move the client ID to environment variables
- Update error messages to be generic
- Timeline: 1 day
Implement Security Headers
- Add helmet.js or manually set security headers
- Configure appropriate CSP policies
- Timeline: 2 days
Secure Service Account Management
- Use Google Secret Manager for service account keys
- Remove file-based key storage
- Timeline: 3 days
Short-term Actions (Medium Priority)
Environment Variable Management
- Centralize all configuration in environment variables
- Remove hard-coded email addresses
- Use different configurations for dev/staging/prod
- Timeline: 1 week
Error Message Sanitization
- Implement a centralized error handler
- Log detailed errors server-side
- Return generic messages to clients
- Timeline: 1 week
Test File Isolation
- Move test files to a separate test directory
- Use proper mocking for external services
- Add .gitignore rules for test artifacts
- Timeline: 3 days
Long-term Actions (Low Priority)
API Key Rotation
- Implement automated key rotation
- Add key expiration policies
- Timeline: 2 weeks
Security Monitoring
- Implement request anomaly detection
- Add security event logging
- Set up alerting for suspicious activities
- Timeline: 3 weeks
Input Validation Enhancement
- Add content scanning for uploaded files
- Implement virus scanning integration
- Timeline: 1 month
Security Best Practices Already Implemented
Authentication & Authorization
- API key-based authentication
- Rate limiting per user plan
- Proper session management
Input Validation
- File size limits
- MIME type validation
- Field validation
Error Handling
- Structured error responses
- Appropriate HTTP status codes
- No stack traces in production
Data Protection
- No persistent storage of user files
- In-memory processing only
- Automatic cleanup
Recommendations
Security Testing
- Implement automated security scanning in CI/CD
- Regular dependency vulnerability scanning
- Penetration testing before major releases
Documentation
- Create security guidelines for developers
- Document security architecture
- Maintain security incident response plan
Compliance
- Review GDPR compliance for EU users
- Implement data retention policies
- Add security policy endpoints
Conclusion
The Convert to Markdown API demonstrates good security practices in authentication and input validation. However, the identified issues with hard-coded credentials, missing security headers, and service account management require immediate attention. Implementing the remediation plan will significantly improve the security posture of the application.
The development team should prioritize the immediate actions and establish a regular security review process to maintain and improve security over time.